Unclear documentation about details Assertion

Gatling (Open-Source)
1

Hi,

I used the details assertion with Websockets today for the first time.
These take a path as argument and for me it wasnt clear that this path is actually the name of the Check and not the name of the Request. At least thats the case with Websockets.

I would suggest to update the docs: https://gatling.io/docs/current/general/assertions/ to make this more clear. Cos I ended up debugging into the AssertionValidator to find out.

PS: I didnt see the docs beeing open source otherwise I would have provided a PR for this.

Br
David

2

Contributions welcome!
Please check the link in the contribute section at the bottom of the right menu.

Note: we’ll release 3.1.0 tomorrow !

3

Oh! I am blind… sorry.

Here you go: https://github.com/gatling/gatling/pull/3710

btw:
I want to also take the change to say Thank you! for such a great tool! I really enjoy using it!
I was even able to extend gatling with some custom code for measuring the propagation delay from AMQP to Websocket. I will share this in the next days here in the forum, would like to hear what you guys think about it.

4

You mean 3.1.0.1 ?

:wink: